![]() |
|
|
注册 |
登录 |
帮助 |
搜索 |
排行榜
|
|
» 博派专利论坛 » 职场与求职
» 其他
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
| 作者 | 英国MIP杂志公布的2007年亚洲IP公司排名 |
盘尼西林
初级站友 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
发贴: 35 积分: 2 |
于 2008-02-20 18:12
Tier 1 Davies Collison Cave Griffith Hack Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick Spruson & Ferguson Tier 2 F B Rice & Co Shelston IP Watermark Tier 3 Blake Dawson Waldron Freehills Madderns Wray & Associates Tier 4 Allens Arthur Robinson Callinan Lawrie Cullen & Co Halford & Co Mallesons Stephen Jacques Pizzeys PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Allens Arthur Robinson Tier 2 Blake Dawson Waldron Clayton Utz Davies Collison Cave Freehills Mallesons Stephen Jacques Spruson & Ferguson Tier 3 Baker & McKenzie Corrs Chambers Westgarth Griffith Hack Minter Ellison Shelston IP Tier 4 Banki Haddock Fiora China PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Liu, Shen & Associates Tier 2 CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office China Patent Agent (HK) China Science Patent & Trademark Agents Shanghai Patent & Trademark Law Office LLC Tier 3 Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency China Sinda Jeekai & Partners NTD Patent & Trademark Agency Zhongzi Law Office Tier 4 Kangxin Partners PC King & Wood Tier 5 China Trademark & Patent Law Office Co Dragon International Patent Office East IP Insight Intellectual Property Lehman, Lee & Xu Lung Tin International IP Agent Tee & Howe Unitalen Law Office Wan Hui Da Intellectual Property PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Liu, Shen & Associates Tier 2 CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office China Patent Agent (HK) King & Wood Tier 3 China Science Patent & Trademark Agents China Sinda Jeekai & Partners Kangxin Partners PC NTD Patent & Trademark Agency Shanghai Patent & Trademark Law Office LLC Zhongzi Law Office Tier 4 Insight Intellectual Property Lehman, Lee & Xu Zy & Partners China: foreign firms PATENT Tier 1 Baker & McKenzie Lovells Tier 2 Bird & Bird Deacons Rouse & Co Tier 3 Johnson Stokes & Master Jones Day Vivien Chan & Co Wilkinson & Grist Hong Kong PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Deacons Lloyd Wise Tier 2 Baker & McKenzie Marks & Clerk Wilkinson & Grist Tier 3 Johnson Stokes & Master Lovells Sit, Fung, Kwong & Shum Tier 4 Eccles & Lee Richards Butler Simmons & Simmons Vivien Chan & Co PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Deacons Lovells Tier 2 Baker & McKenzie Bird & Bird Wilkinson & Grist Tier 3 Johnson Stokes & Master Tier 4 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Richards Butler Robin Bridge & John Liu Sit, Fung, Kwong & Shum India PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Anand and Anand D P Ahuja & Co Remfry & Sagar Tier 2 De Penning & De Penning S Majumdar & Co Subramaniam, Nataraj & Associates Tier 3 Groser & Groser H K Acharya & Co Kan & Krishme Krishna & Saurastri L S Davar & Co Lall & Sethi Lall Lahiri & Salhotra Lex Orbis IP Practice Tier 4 Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co Amarjit & Associates Fox Mandal Little Khaitan & Co PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Anand and Anand Tier 2 K & S Partners Lall Lahiri & Salhotra Remfry & Sagar Tier 3 Amarjit & Associates H K Acharya & Company Krishna & Saurastri Lall & Sethi Man Mohan Singh Associates Tier 4 D P Ahuja & Co De Penning & De Penning H W Kane Kan & Krishme Khaitan & Co L S Davar & Co Lex Orbis IP Practice Indonesia PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Biro Oktroi Roosseno Tier 2 Am Badar & Partners Tier 3 Amroos & Partners Int-Tra-Patent Bureau Pacific Patent Rouse & Co International Tier 4 George Widjojo & Partners Hadiputranto, Hadinoto & Partners PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Hadiputranto, Hadinoto & Partners Lubis, Santosa & Maulana Tier 2 Int-Tra-Patent Bureau Rouse & Co International/Suryomurcito & Co Soedmadipradja & Taher Tier 3 S Gautama & Associates Japan PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Nakamura & Partners Tier 2 Abe, Ikubo & Katayama Asamura Patent Office Seiwa Patent & Law Suzuye & Suzuye Yuasa & Hara Tier 3 Aoyama & Partners Kyowa Patent & Law Office Ohtsuka Patent Office Tier 4 Hiroe & Associates Okabe International Patent Office Shiga International Patent Office Shusaku Yamamoto Soei Patent & Law Firm Yamakawa International Patent Office PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Nakamura & Partners Tier 2 Abe, Ikubo & Katayama Yuasa & Hara Tier 3 Abe & Matsutome Anderson Mori & Tomotsune Ohno & Partners TMI Associates Tier 4 City-Yuwa Partners Hibiya Park Law Offices Mori Hamada & Matsumoto Tokyo Aoyama Aoki Law Office/ Baker & McKenzie Tokyo Eiwa Attorneys at Law Tier 5 Kyowa Patent & Law Office New Tokyo International Soei Patent & Law Firm Japan: foreign firms PATENT Tier 1 Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner Lovells Morrison & Foerster Tier 2 Hogan & Hartson Sughrue Mion PLLC Tier 3 Foley & Lardner LLP Morgan Lewis Malaysia PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Henry Goh & Co Sdn Bhd Shearn Delamore & Co Tier 2 KASS International Sdn Bhd Raja, Darryl & Loh Tier 3 Patrick Mirandah Co RamRais & Partners Shook Lin & Bok Skrine Tay & Partners Tier 4 Advanz Fidelis PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Shearn Delamore & Co Tier 2 RamRais & Partners Shook Lin & Bok Skrine Sreenevasan Advocates & Solicitors Wong & Partners/Baker & McKenzie Tier 3 Raja, Darryl & Loh Tay & Partners Tier 4 Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill New Zealand PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 A J Park Baldwins Tier 2 Henry Hughes James & Wells Pipers PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 A J Park Baldwins Tier 2 Henry Hughes James & Wells Tier 3 Kensington Swan Pakistan PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Bharucha & Co United Trademark & Patent Services Vellani & Vellani Tier 2 Remfry & Son Sheikh Brothers Tier 3 Ali & Associates Khursheed Khan & Associates PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 United Trademark & Patent Services Vellani & Vellani Tier 2 Ali & Associates Bharucha & Co Tier 3 Khursheed Khan & Associates Remfry & Son Sheikh Brothers The Philippines PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan Tier 2 Castillo Laman Tan Pantaleon & San Jose E B Astudillo & Associates Poblador Azada & Bucoy Romulo Mabanta Buenaventura Sayoc & De Los Angeles Sapalo Velez Bundang & Bulilan Siguion Reyna Montecillo & Ongsiako Tier 3 ACCRA Law Offices Del Rosario Bagamasbad & Raboca Ortega Del Castillo Bacorro Odulio Calma & Carbonell Tier 4 Carag Caballes Jamora & Somera Hechanova & Co Manuel Cases Jr & Associates Villaraza & Angangco Law Offices Zobella & Co PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 ACCRA Law Offices SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan Tier 2 Ortega Del Castillo Bacorro Odulio Calma & Carbonell Poblador Bautista & Reyes Sapalo Velez Bundang & Bulilan Siguion Reyna Montecillo & Ongsiako Tier 3 Castillo Laman Tan Pantaleon & San Jose Del Rosario Bagamasbad & Raboca Esguerra & Blanco Quasha Ancheta Pe?a & Nolasco Quisumbing Torres/Baker & McKenzie R V Domingo & Associates Singapore PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Drew & Napier LLC Tier 2 Alban Tay Mahtani & de Silva Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson Tier 3 Donaldson & Burkinshaw Lloyd Wise Rodyk & Davidson Tier 4 Allen & Gledhill Amica Law LLC Lawrence Y D Ho & Associates One Legal Shook Lin & Bok PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Alban Tay Mahtani & de Silva Drew & Napier LLC Tier 2 Rodyk & Davidson Shook Lin & Bok Tier 3 Allen & Gledhill Amica Law LLC Donaldson & Burkinshaw Lee & Lee One Legal South Korea PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Kim & Chang Tier 2 Firstlaw Lee & Ko Lee International IP & Law Group Y P Lee, Mock & Partners You Me Patent & Law Firm Tier 3 Koreana Nam & Nam Park, Kim & Partner Tier 4 Bae, Kim & Lee DeRyook International Patent & Law Firm Hanyang International Y S Chang & Associates Yoon Yang Kim Shin & Yu Tier 5 E M Hwang & Partners Kims & Lees PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Kim & Chang Tier 2 Firstlaw Lee & Ko Lee International IP & Law Group Tier 3 Koreana Y P Lee, Mock & Partners You Me Patent & Law Firm Tier 4 Bae, Kim & Lee Central International Law Firm DeRyook International Patent & Law Firm Hanyang International Hwang Mok Park Nam & Nam Y S Chang & Associates Yoon Yang Kim Shin & Yu Tier 5 E M Hwang & Partners Kims & Lees Sri Lanka PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 F J & G de Saram John Wilson Partners Julius & Creasy Murugesu & Neelakandan Tier 2 D L & F de Saram Nithya Partners Sudath Perera Associates Varners PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 John Wilson Partners Julius & Creasy Murugesu & Neelakandan Tier 2 F J & G de Saram Nithya Partners Sudath Perera Associates Taiwan PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Lee and Li Saint Island International Patent & Law Offices TIPLO Tier 2 Tai E International Patent & Law Office Tsai, Lee & Chen Wood & Wu Patent & Trademark Office Tier 3 Asian Pacific International Patent & Trademark Office Tsar & Tsai Law Firm Union Patent Service Center Tier 4 Alfred & Jason Long River PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Lee and Li Tier 2 Saint Island International Patent Law Offices Tai E International Patent & Law Office Tsar & Tsai Law Firm Tier 3 TIPLO Tsai, Lee & Chen Tier 4 Long River Wood & Wu Patent & Trademark Office Thailand PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Domnern Somgiat & Boonma Tilleke & Gibbins International Ltd Tier 2 Baker & McKenzie Tier 3 Anek & Brischon Chavalit & Associates Satyapon & Partners Ltd S&I International Bangkok Office Tier 4 Marut Bunnag International Law Office Rouse & Co International PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Tilleke & Gibbins International Ltd Tier 2 Baker & McKenzie Domnern Somgiat & Boonma Tier 3 Chavalit & Associates Rouse & Co Satyapon & Partners Ltd Tier 4 International Legal Counsellors Thailand Vietnam PATENT PROSECUTION Tier 1 Pham & Associates Tier 2 Baker & McKenzie Invenco Vision & Associates Tier 3 Investconsult Group Investip Rouse & Co International Tier 4 Le & Le Winco Tier 5 Banca P & TB (VCCI) PATENT CONTENTIOUS Tier 1 Pham & Associates Tier 2 Baker & McKenzie Vision & Associates Tier 3 Banca Rouse & Co International Winco Tier 4 P & TB (VCCI) 以上来自博派专利 论坛 www.biopatent.cn/bbs
2010专利代理人考试考前集中培训录音 杭州 知识产权研究会 博派导航站:知识产权从业人员的上网入口 |
| 作者 | Re:英国MIP杂志公布的2007年亚洲IP公司排名 |
wizardfox
高级站友 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
发贴: 356 积分: 23 |
于 2008-02-21 11:31
这个帖子应该顶啊 这个杂志还是很权威的 以上来自博派专利 论坛 www.biopatent.cn/bbs 相对于与写实用新型,写发明有些什么不同。 美团网:仅售22元!原价50元的冠军溜冰场溜冰卡 |
| 作者 | Re:英国MIP杂志公布的2007年亚洲IP公司排名 |
饭桶
高级站友 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
发贴: 238 积分: 32 |
于 2008-02-21 11:37
这个排名以什么数据为基础?各国的数据如何获得? 以上来自博派专利 论坛 www.biopatent.cn/bbs 1898年(光绪24年),光绪皇帝接受维新派建议,决心变法,在“百日维新”运动中提出了“除旧布新”的设想,发布了包括奖励新发明在内的数十条改革政令,颁布了“振兴工艺给奖章程”,设置了为期50年、30年、10年的专利制度。这是我国历史上实行专利制度的初次尝试。 69天啦,实务还没看呢,着急啊! 图书畅销榜名单 |
| 作者 | Re:英国MIP杂志公布的2007年亚洲IP公司排名 |
sldsnake
初级站友 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
发贴: 1 积分: 0 |
于 2008-02-21 11:46
这里面好像只是说了专利争吵和专利起诉啊 以上来自博派专利 论坛 www.biopatent.cn/bbs 独权写了差不多一页,是不是哪里有问题? |
| 作者 | Re:英国MIP杂志公布的2007年亚洲IP公司排名 |
wizardfox
高级站友 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
发贴: 356 积分: 23 |
于 2008-02-21 12:18
杂志是这么说的 Managing IP's exclusive survey of the world IP market, now in its 12th year of publication, provides a unique perspective on IP practice based on the experiences of hundreds of clients and practitioners worldwide. In the following pages, we reveal which firms are recommended, as well as which are rated in the top tier, covering both prosecution and contentious work. Over the past five months, our team of five researchers based in London, New York and Hong Kong have spoken to hundreds of practitioners and in-house counsel to gather information about the patent market in 65 jurisdictions. Many more lawyers and attorneys have completed detailed questionnaires providing information on their own practice, other firms and the overall trends in the IP market. We have also contacted many in-house counsel to ask their views on the outside advisers they use and recommend in each jurisdiction. The results of this research are detailed rankings of the leading firms practising intellectual property in each country. As in the past three years, the lists of the leading firms are presented in the form of tiers. The total number of firms listed in each jurisdiction varies according to the size of the market. This means that the survey is not an exhaustive list of every firm in each jurisdiction; even firms listed in the lower tiers have been recommended by a number of practitioners and deserve congratulations on their inclusion. Those in the top tiers received the most recommendations for the quality and depth of their practice. The World IP Survey is not simply a list of the biggest firms, or a list of those that have the biggest caseload or are the oldest. Instead, it is a qualitative ranking of the leading firms in each category and reveals which firms are rated by their peers for the strength of their expertise and the depth of their ability to service clients. 以上来自博派专利 论坛 www.biopatent.cn/bbs 化学硕士加律师 这样的背景前景如何? |
| 作者 | Re:英国MIP杂志公布的2007年亚洲IP公司排名 |
freemode
初级站友 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
发贴: 90 积分: 17 |
于 2008-02-21 14:19
small flower~~ wizardfox wrote: 以上来自博派专利 论坛 www.biopatent.cn/bbs 无效 细则20-2 一问 缺乏必要技术特征 |
| 作者 | Re:英国MIP杂志公布的2007年亚洲IP公司排名 |
wizardfox
高级站友 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
发贴: 356 积分: 23 |
于 2008-02-21 22:15
=.= 以上来自博派专利 论坛 www.biopatent.cn/bbs 关于今年考试答复意通时修改权利要求书 |
| 作者 | Re:英国MIP杂志公布的2007年亚洲IP公司排名 |
londonwalker
初级站友 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
发贴: 15 积分: 1 |
于 2008-04-23 09:04
如果有美国和英国的IP事务所排名, 能不能也一起贴出来看看? 以上来自博派专利 论坛 www.biopatent.cn/bbs 直径95,对比文件是70-105,有没有新颖性? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
已读帖子 新的帖子 被删除的帖子 |
|