Of American Patent System

Now i am approaching the patent system of US. At first , it is necessary to know about the outline of that country\'s pantent law. Maybe  some fellows who want to  go together with me?

良心代理 wrote:
lz is chinese. lz\'s english is chinese english too. hehe~~~~~

yes, 良心代理, my writing ability of English is not strong. But what were  posted above  mainly depend on the book An Introduction to Patent Law, written by Janice M. Mueller. I am always looking forward to your further warm suggestion that which part/sentence/writing style works defectively. Please and thanks.

lz is chinese. lz\'s english is chinese english too. hehe~~~~~

chinese patent law will modified
the new law will be good for all the people except those who work in the
patent agent office
are there anyone kowns it!

here comes a simple question, are we learning, or copying American way in patent field?

Are you sure it(the\'[]\') is an indicating for detailed expanation? While i think (but
not quite sure) it indicates difference from the reference. eg: the lovely angelanxiumei said:\" sometimes a[n]  alphabet will appear upon a unfamiliar term indicating detail[ed]  explanation in disposition under the straight matter\".

ps: hehe , just now i asked an experienced attorny of Clifford Chance and my
said words were confirmed.

I remember if you read a specific case, sometimes a alphabet will appear upon a unfamiliar term indicating detail explaination in disposition under the straight matter, heading with  symbol “[]” plus the alphabet therein.

Before discussing the patentable subjects regulated in 35USC, I am trying to learn something about  the sources of us patent law.
     First, the US Constitution’s statement of the congress’s power to “promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” (comparing to the PRC Constitution, section 20: The state promotes the development of the  natural  and  social  sciences, disseminates knowledge of science and technology, and commends and rewards  achievements in scientific research as well as  technological  innovations  and inventions.)

   And secondly the federal statutes and regulations. Then the most important , the case law. I don’t have much experiences to read the opinions of the Federal Circuit and a question confuses me for quite a long time: I don’t know the intention of “[]” in the text of different opinions , such as “n the absence of any indication of illegal tying……”. Who can tell me WHY?

Yes, I am mainly dealing  with Chinese and international patent applications. And for better undstanding of patent (or IP) system growing up in China...so , here I am. Thanks for joining me.

As a beginner, I would start with USPTO\'s web site for general information and updates on patent regulations.

You are not drafting US patent applications, are you?